The Holy See
           back          up     Help

Alphabetical    [«  »]
argued 7
argues 8
arguing 9
argument 54
argumentation 1
argumentative 1
arguments 25
Frequency    [«  »]
55 sorrow
55 tore
54 68
54 argument
54 attributed
54 barnabas
54 booty
New American Bible

2002 11 11
IntraText - Concordances
argument
                                                                      bold = Main text
   Part, Book  Chapter:Verse                                          grey = Comment text
1 Pent, Deu 6: 13(3) | Lord (Matthew 4:10) as an argument against worshiping the devil. ~ 2 Pent, Jos 22: 20(4) | this fact is adduced as an argument for the solidarity and mutual 3 WisdB, Job 6: 25 | how unconvincing is your argument! ~ 4 WisdB, Job 22: 6(1) | to dramatize the latter's argument that God always acts justly 5 WisdB, Job 24: 25 | confute me, and reduce my argument to nought? ~ ~ ~ 6 WisdB, Psa 68: 1(1) | derived from Judges 5:4-5. The argument develops in nine stanzas ( 7 ProphB, Eze 16: 52 | bear your shame; you are an argument in favor of your sisters! 8 Gosp, Mat 12: 5(4) | This and the following argument (Matthew 12:7) are peculiar 9 Gosp, Mat 12: 5(4) | holocausts (Numbers 28:9-10). The argument is that the law itself requires 10 Gosp, Mat 18: 19(16)| 17. Unless an a fortiori argument is supposed, this seems 11 Gosp, Mat 22: 23(14)| God (Matthew 22:29). His argument in respect to God's power 12 Gosp, Mat 22: 23(14)| death (Matthew 22:30). His argument based on the scriptures ( 13 Gosp, Mat 22: 31(18)| alive. This might appear no argument for the resurrection, but 14 Gosp, Luk 9: 46 | 46 ~22 An argument arose among the disciples 15 Gosp, Luk 22: 24 | 24 ~8 Then an argument broke out among them about 16 Gosp, Joh Int | gospel constitutes a strong argument that the Johannine tradition 17 Gosp, Joh 15: 25(11)| Their law reflects the argument of the church with the synagogue.~ 18 Gosp, Act 16: 10(3) | however, lends weight to the argument that the "we" includes Luke 19 NTLet, Rom 7: 7(2) | diatribe for the sake of argument. He aims to depict the disastrous 20 NTLet, Rom 9: 19(8) | than the rejection of an argument that places humanity on 21 NTLet, 1Cor 4: 14(5) | children: the close of the argument is dominated by the tender 22 NTLet, 1Cor 4: 18(6) | the similar ending to an argument in 2 Cor 13:1-4, 10.~ 23 NTLet, 1Cor 6: 12(5) | Cor 10:23, and the whole argument of 1 Cor 8-10 on the finality 24 NTLet, 1Cor 6: 19(8) | Glorify God in your body: the argument concludes with a positive 25 NTLet, 1Cor 8: 1(1) | a sustained and unified argument that illustrates Paul's 26 NTLet, 1Cor 9: 1(1) | authority and experience. The argument is unified by repetitions; 27 NTLet, 1Cor 9: 27(9) | paradoxical turn to the argument: what appears at first a 28 NTLet, 1Cor 11: 11(7) | parenthetical remarks relativize the argument from Genesis 2-3. In the 29 NTLet, 1Cor 11: 13(8) | 13-16] The argument for conformity to common 30 NTLet, 1Cor 15: 1(2) | a starting point for his argument. This is the fundamental 31 NTLet, 1Cor 15: 35(16)| and 1 Cor 15:50-58. His argument is fundamentally theological 32 NTLet, 2Cor Int | appropriate response. All his argument centers on the destiny of 33 NTLet, 2Cor Int | treatment and the thrust of the argument differ in each of these 34 NTLet, 2Cor 3: 8(8) | 8-11] How much more: the argument "from the less to the greater" 35 NTLet, 2Cor 3: 14(11)| his contemporaries; his argument is typological, as in 1 36 NTLet, 2Cor 8: 12(12)| Cor 8:15 Paul grounds his argument unexpectedly in the experience 37 NTLet, Gal 2: 3(4) | unlikely in the overall argument.~ 38 NTLet, Gal 2: 15(15)| incidents cited above, Paul's argument, whether spoken to Kephas 39 NTLet, Gal 3: 6(6) | justification. This first argument forms the basis for the 40 NTLet, Gal 3: 10(8) | no other way returns the argument to the experience cited 41 NTLet, Gal 3: 15(9) | 15-18] A third argument to support Paul's position 42 NTLet, Gal 3: 15(9) | by law (Gal 3:18). Paul's argument hinges on the fact that 43 NTLet, Gal 3: 23(15)| 29] Paul adds a further argument in support of righteousness 44 NTLet, Gal 4: 21(14)| 2:16; 3:2) by a further argument from scripture (cf Gal 3: 45 NTLet, 1Tim 2: 8 | hands, without anger or argument. ~ 46 NTLet, Heb Int | A.D. 70. In that case, the argument of the letter is more easily 47 NTLet, Heb 2: 1(1) | exhortation, using an a fortiori argument (as at Hebrews 7:21-22; 48 NTLet, Heb 6: 16 | guarantee and puts an end to all argument. ~ 49 NTLet, Heb 7: 2(3) | passage. This supports the argument of the midrash and makes 50 NTLet, Heb 7: 16(12)| possible objection to his argument but implicitly refutes it 51 NTLet, Heb 10: 37(17)| 37-38] In support of his argument, the author uses Habakkuk 52 CathL, Jam 4: 6(5) | The point of this whole argument is that God wants the happiness 53 CathL, 1Joh Int | is not one of theological argument but one of intense religious 54 CathL, Jude | as part of his structured argument, whereas 2 Peter omits both


Copyright © Libreria Editrice Vaticana