MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS
POPE JOHN PAUL II
FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE DAY OF PEACE
1 JANUARY 1982
PEACE:
A GIFT OF GOD ENTRUSTED TO US !
To the young who in the world of tomorrow will make the great
decisions, to the men and women who today bear responsibility for life in
society, to families and teachers, to individuals and communities, to
Heads of State and Government leaders: It is to all of you that I address
this message at the dawn of the year 1982. I invite you to reflect with me on
the theme of the new World Day: peace is a gift of God entrusted to us.
1. This truth faces us when we come to decide our commitments
and make our choices. It
challenges the whole of humanity, all men and women who know that they are
individually responsible for one another, and together responsible for the
world.
At the end of the First World War my predecessor Pope Benedict
XV devoted an Encyclical to this theme. Rejoicing at the cessation of
hostilities and insisting on the need to remove hatred and enmity through
reconciliation inspired by mutual charity, he began his Encyclical with a
reference to "peace, that magnificent gift from God: as Augustine
says, ‘even understood as one of the fleeting things of earth, no sweeter word
is heard, no more desirable wish is longed for, and no better discovery can be
made than this gift' (De Civitate Dei, lib. XIX, c. x1)" (Encyclical
Pacem Dei Munus: AAS 12 [1920], p. 209).
Efforts for peace in a divided world
2. Since then my predecessors have often had to recall this
truth in their constant endeavours to educate for peace and to encourage work
for a lasting peace. Today peace has become, throughout the world, a major
preoccupation not only for those responsible for the destiny of nations but even
more so for broad sections of the population and numberless individuals who
generously and tenaciously dedicate themselves to creating an outlook of peace
and to establishing genuine peace between peoples and nations. This is
comforting. But there is no hiding the fact that, in spite of the efforts of all
men and women of good will there are still serious threats to peace in the
world. Some of these threats take the form of divisions within various
nations; others stem from deep-rooted and acute tensions between opposing
nations and blocs within the world community.
In reality, the confrontations that we witness today are
distinguished from those of past history by certain new characteristics. In the
first place, they are worldwide: even a local conflict is often an
expression of tensions originating elsewhere in the world. In the same way, it
often happens that a conflict has profound effects far from where it broke out.
Another characteristic is
totality: present-day tensions mobilize all the forces of the nations
involved; moreover, selfish monopolization and even hostility are to be found
today as much in the way economic life is run and in the technological
application of science as in the way that the mass media or military resources
are utilized. Thirdly, we must stress the radical character of modern
conflicts: it is the survival of the whole human race that is at stake in them,
given the destructive capacity of present-day military stockpiles.
In short, while many factors could contribute to uniting it,
human society appears as a divided world: the forces for unity give way bef ore
the divisions between East and West, North and South, friend and enemy.
An essential problem
3. The causes of this situation are of course complex and of
various orders. Political reasons are naturally the easiest to
distinguish. Particular groups abuse their power in order to impose their yoke
on whole societies. An excessive desire for expansion impels some nations to
build their prosperity with a disregard for - indeed at the expense of - others'
happiness. Unbridled nationalism thus fosters plans for domination, which leave
other nations with the pitiless dilemma of having to make the choice: either
accepting satellite status and dependence or adopting an attitude of competition
and hostility. Deeper analysis shows that the cause of this situation is the
application of certain concepts and ideologies that claim to offer the
only foundation of the truth about man, society and history.
When we come up against the choice between peace and war, we
find ourselves face to face with ourselves, with our nature, with our plans for
our personal and community lives, with the use we are to make of our freedom.
Are relationships between people to continue inexorably along lines of
incomprehension and merciless confrontation, because of a relentless law of human
life? Or are human beings - by comparison with the animal species which fight
one another according to the "law" of the jungle - specifically called
upon and given the fundamental capability to live in peace with their fellows
and to share with them in the creation of culture, society and history? In the
final analysis, when we consider the question of peace, we are led to consider
the meaning and conditions of our own personal and community lives.
Peace, a gift of God
4. Peace is not so much a superficial balance between diverging
material interests - a balance pertaining to the order of quantity, of things.
Rather it is, in its inmost reality, something that belongs to the essentially
human order, the order of human subjects; it is thus of a rational and moral
nature, the fruit of truth and virtue. It springs from the dynamism of free
wills guided by reason towards the common good that is to be attained in truth,
justice and love. This rational and moral order is based on a decision by
the consciences of human beings seeking harmony in their mutual relationships,
with respect for justice for everybody, and therefore with respect for the
fundamental human rights inherent in every person. One cannot see how this moral
order could
ignore God, the first source of being, the essential truth and the supreme good.
In this very sense peace comes from God as its foundation:
it is a gift of God. When claiming the wealth and resources of the universe
worked on by the human mind - and it is often on their account that conflicts
and wars have sprung up - "man comes up against the leading role of the
gift made by 'nature', that is to say, in the final analysis, by the
Creator" (Encyclical Laborem Exercens, 12). And God does more than give
creation to humanity to administer and develop jointly at the service of all
human beings without any discrimination: he also inscribes in the human
conscience the laws obliging us to respect in numerous ways the life and the
whole person of our fellow human beings, created like us in the image and after
the likeness of God. God is thus the guarantor of all these fundamental
human rights. Yes indeed, God is the source of peace: he calls to peace, he
safeguards it, and he grants it as the fruit of "justice".
Moreover, God helps us interiorly to achieve peace or to
recover it. In our limited life, which is subject to error and evil, we human
beings go gropingly in search of peace, amid many difficulties. Our faculties
are darkened by mere appearances of truth, attracted by false goods and led
astray by irrational and selfish instincts. Hence we need to open ourselves to
the transcendent light of God that illuminates our lives, purifies them from
error and frees them from aggressive passion. God is not far from the heart of
those who pray to him and try to fulfil his justice: when they are in continual
dialogue with him, in freedom, God offers them peace as the fullness of the
communion of life with God and with their
brothers and sisters. In the Bible the word "peace" recurs again and
again in association with the idea of happiness, harmony, well-being, security,
concord, salvation and justice, as the outstanding blessing that God, "the
Lord of peace" (2 Thess 3:16), already gives and promises in
abundance: "Now towards her I send flowing peace, like a river" (Is
66: 12).
A gift of God, entrusted to us
5. While peace is a gift, man is never dispensed from
responsibility for seeking it and endeavouring to establish it by individual and
community effort, throughout history. God's gift of peace is therefore also at
all times a human conquest and achievement, since it is offered to us in order
that we may accept it freely and put it progressively into operation by our
creative will. Furthermore, in his love for man, God never abandons us but even
in the darkest moments of history drives us forward or leads us back
mysteriously along the path of peace. Even the difficulties, failures and
tragedies of the past and the present must be studied as providential lessons
from which we may draw the wisdom we need in order to find new ways, more
rational and courageous ways, for building peace. It is by drawing inspiration
from the truth of God that we are given the ideal and the energy we require in
order to overcome situations of injustice, to free ourselves from ideologies of
power and domination, and to make our way towards true universal fraternity.
Christians, faithful to Christ who proclaimed "the
Good News of peace" and established peace within hearts
by reconciling them with God, have still more decisive reasons - as I shall
stress at the end of this message -
for looking on peace as a gift of God, and for courageously helping to establish
it in this world, in accordance with this longing for its complete fulfilment in
the Kingdom of God. They also know that they are called upon to join their
efforts with those of believers in other religions who tirelessly condemn
hatred and war and who devote themselves, using different approaches, to the
advancement of justice and peace.
We should first consider in its natural basis this deeply
hopeful view of humanity as directed towards peace, and stress moral
responsibility in response to God's gift. This illuminates and stimulates man's
activity on the level of information, study and commitment for peace, three
sectors that I would now like to illustrate with some examples.
Information
6. At a certain level, world peace depends on better
self-knowledge on the part of both individuals and societies. This
self-knowledge is naturally conditioned by information and by the quality of the
information. Those who seek and proclaim the truth with respect for others and
with charity are working for peace. Those who devote themselves to pointing out
the values in the various cultures, the individuality of each society and the
human riches of individual peoples, are working for peace. Those who by
providing information remove the barrier of distance, so that we feel truly
concerned at the fate of faraway men and women who are victims of war or
injustice, are working for peace. Admittedly,
the accumulation of such information, especially if it concerns catastrophes
over which we have no control, can in the end produce indifference and surfeit
in those who remain mere receivers of the inf ormation without ever doing
whatever is within their power. But, in itself, the role of the mass media
continues to be a positive one: each one of us is now called upon to be the
neighbour of all his or her brothers and sisters of the human race (cf. Lk
10: 29-37).
High-quality information even has a direct influence upon
education and political decisions. If the young are to be made aware of the
problems of peace, and if they are to prepare to become workers for peace,
educational programmes must necessarily give a special place to information
about actual situations in which peace is under threat, and about the conditions
needed for its advancement. Peace cannot be built by the power of rulers alone.
Peace can be firmly constructed only if it corresponds to the resolute
determination of all people of good will. Rulers must be supported and
enlightened by a public opinion that encourages them or, where necessary,
expresses disapproval. Consequently, it is also right that rulers should explain
to the public those matters that concern the problems of peace.
Studies that help to build peace
7. Building peace also depends upon the progress of research
about it. Scientific studies on war, its nature, causes, means, objectives and
risks have much to teach us on the conditions for peace. Since they throw light
on the relationships between war and politics, such
studies show that there is a greater future in negotiation than in arms for
settling conflicts.
It follows that the role of law in preserving peace is called
upon to expand. It is well known that within individual States the work of jurists
contributes greatly to the advancement of justice and respect for human rights.
But their role is just as great for the pursuit of the same objectives on the
international level and for refining the juridical instruments for building and
preserving peace.
However, since concern for peace is inscribed in the inmost
depths of our being, progress along the path of peace also benefits from the
researches of psychologists and philosophers. Admittedly, the
science of war has already been enriched by studies on human aggressiveness,
death-impulses and the herd instinct that can suddenly take possession of whole
societies. But much remains to be said about the fear we human beings have of
taking possession of our freedom, and about our insecurity before ourselves and
others. Better knowledge of life-impulses, of instinctive sympathy with other
people, of readiness to love and share undoubtedly helps us to grasp better the
psychological mechanisms that favour peace.
By these researches psychology is thus called upon to throw
light on and to complement the studies of the philosophers. Philosophers have
always pondered the questions of war and peace. They have never been without
responsibility in this matter. The memory is all too much alive of those famous
philosophers who saw man as "a wolf for his fellow man" and war as a
historical necessity. However, it is also true that many of them wished to lay
the foundation for a lasting or
even everlasting peace by, for instance, setting forth a solid theoretical basis
for international law.
All these efforts deserve to be resumed and intensified. The
thinkers who devote themselves to such endeavours can benefit from the copious
contribution of a present-day philosophical current that gives unique prominence
to the theme of the person and devotes itself in a singular manner to an
examination of the themes of freedom and responsibility. This can provide light
for reflection on human rights, justice and peace.
Indirect action
8. While the advancement of peace in a sense depends on
information and research, it rests above all on the action that people take in
its favour. Some forms of action envisaged here have only an indirect
relationship with peace. However, it would be wrong to think of them as
unimportant: as we shall briefly indicate through some examples, almost every
section of human activity offers unexpected occasions for advancing peace.
Such is the case of cultural exchanges, in the broadest
sense. Anything that enables people to get to know each other better through
artistic activity breaks down barriers. Where speech is unavailing and diplomacy
is an uncertain aid, music, painting, drama and sport can bring people closer
together. The same holds for scientific research: science, like art,
creates and brings together a universal society which gathers all who love truth
and beauty, without division. Thus science and art are, each at its own level,
an anticipation of the emergence of a universal peaceful society.
Even economic life should bring people closer together,
by making them aware of the extent to which they are interdependent and
complementary. Undoubtedly, economic relationships often create a field of
pitiless confrontation, merciless competition and even sometimes shameless
exploitation. But could not these relationships become instead relationships of
service and solidarity, and thereby defuse one of the most frequent causes of
discord?
Justice and peace within nations
9. While peace should be everyone's concern, the building of
peace is a task that falls directly and principally to political leaders.
From this point of view the chief setting for the building up of peace is always
the nation as a politically organized society. Since the purpose for which a
political society is formed is the establishment of justice, the advancement of
the common good and participation by all, that society will enjoy peace only to
the extent that these three demands are respected. Peace can develop only where
the elementary requirements of justice are safeguarded.
Unconditional and effective respect for each one's
imprescriptible and inalienable rights is the necessary condition in order that
peace may reign in a society. Vis-a-vis these basic rights all others are in a
way derivatory and secondary. In a society in which these rights are not
protected, the very idea of universality is dead, as soon as a small group of
individuals set up for their own exclusive advantage a principle of
discrimination whereby the rights and even the lives of others are made
dependent on the whim of the stronger. Such a society cannot be at peace with
itself: it has within it a principle
leading to division. For the same reason, a political society can really
collaborate in building international peace only if it is itself peaceful, that
is to say if it takes seriously the advancement of human rights at home. To the
extent that the rulers of a particular country apply themselves to building a
fully just society, they are already contributing decisively to building an
authentic, firmly based and lasting peace (cf. Encyclical Pacem in Terris,
11).
Justice and peace between nations
10. While peace within individual nations is a necessary
condition for the development of true peace, it is not enough in itself. The
building of peace on a world scale cannot be the result of the separate desires
of nations, for they are often ambiguous and sometimes contradictory. It was to
make up for this lack that States provided themselves with appropriate
international organizations, one of the chief aims of which is to harmonize
the desires of different nations and cause them to .converge for the
safeguarding of peace and for an increase of justice between nations.
By the authority that they have gained and by their
achievements, the great International Organizations have done remarkable work
for peace. They have of course had failures; they have not been able to prevent
all conflicts or put a speedy end to them. But they have helped to show the
world that war, bloodshed and tears are not the way to end tensions. They have
provided, so to speak, experimental proof that even on the world level people
are able to combine their efforts and seek peace together.
The peace dynamism of Christianity
11. At this point in my message I wish to address more
especially my brothers and sisters in the Church. The Church supports and
encourages all serious efforts for peace. She unhesitatingly proclaims that the
activity of all those who devote the best of their energies to peace forms part
of God's plan of salvation in Jesus Christ. But she reminds Christians that they
have still greater reasons for being active witnesses of God's gift of peace.
In the first place, Christ's word and example have given rise to
new attitudes in favour of peace. Christ has taken the ethics of peace far
beyond the ordinary attitudes of justice and understanding. At the beginning of
his ministry he proclaimed: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be
called children of God" (Mt 5: 9). He sent his disciples to bring
peace from house to house, from town to town (Mt 10: 11-13). He exhorted
them to prefer peace to vengeance of any kind and even to certain legitimate
claims on others - so great was his desire to tear from the human heart the
roots of aggressiveness (Mt 5:38-42). He asked them to love those whom
barriers of any sort have turned into enemies (Mt 5:43-48). He set up as
examples people who were habitually despised (Lk 10:33; 17: 16). He
exhorted people to be always humble and to forgive without any limit (cf. Mt
18:21-22). The attitude of sharing with those in utter want - on which he made
the last judgment hinge (cf. Mt 25:31-46) - was to make a radical
contribution to the establishment of relations of fraternity.
These appeals of Jesus and his example have had
a widespread influence on the attitude of his disciples, as two millennia of
history testify. But Christ's work belongs to a very deep level, of the order of
a mysterious transformation of hearts. He really brought "peace among men
with whom God is pleased" in the words of the proclamation made at his
birth (cf. Lk 2: 14), and this not only by revealing to them the Father's
love but above all by reconciling them with God through his sacrifice. For it
was sin and hatred that were an obstacle to peace with God and with others: he
destroyed them by the offering of his life on the Cross; he reconciled in one
body those who were hostile (cf. Eph 2: 16; Rom 12: 5). His first
words to his Apostles after he rose were: "Peace be with you" (Jn
20: 19). Those who accept the faith form in the Church a prophetic community:
with the Holy Spirit communicated by Christ, after the Baptism that makes them
part of the Body of Christ, they experience the peace given by God in the
sacrament of Reconciliation and in Eucharistic communion; they proclaim
"the gospel of peace" (Eph 6: 15); they try to live it from day
to day, in actual practice; and they long for the time of total reconciliation
when, by a new intervention of the living God who raises the dead, we shall be
wholly open to God and our brothers and sisters. Such is the vision of faith
which supports the activity of Christians on behalf of peace.
Thus, by her very existence, the Church exists within the world
as a society of people who are reconciled and at peace through the grace of
Christ, in a communion of love and life with God and with all their brothers and
sisters, beyond human barriers of every sort; in herself she is already, and she
seeks to become ever more so in practice, a gift and leaven of peace offered by
God
to the whole of the human race. Certainly, the members of the Church are well
aware that they are of ten still sinners, in this sphere too; at least they feel
the grave responsibility of putting into practice this gift of peace. For this
they must first overcome their own divisions, in order to set out without delay
towards the fullness of unity in Christ; thus they collaborate with God in order
to offer his peace to the world. They must also of course combine their efforts
with the efforts of all men and women of good will working for peace in the
different spheres of society and international life. The Church wishes her
children to join, through their witness and their initiatives, the first rank of
those preparing peace and causing it to reign. At the same time, she is very
aware that, on the spot, it is a difficult task, one that calls for much
generosity, discernment and hope, as a real challenge.
Peace as a constant challenge to Christians
12. Christian optimism, based on the glorious Cross of Christ
and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, is no excuse for self-deception. For
Christians, peace on earth is always a challenge, because of the presence of sin
in man's heart. Motivated by their faith and hope, Christians therefore apply
themselves to promoting a more just society; they fight hunger, deprivation and
disease; they are concerned about what happens to migrants, prisoners and
outcasts (cf. Mt 25: 35-36). But they know that, while all these
undertakings express something of the mercy and perfection of God (cf. Lk
6: 36; Mt 4: 48), they are always limited in their range, precarious in
their results and ambiguous in their inspiration. Only God the giver of life,
when he unites all things in Christ (cf. Eph 1: 10), will fulfil our
ardent hope by himself bringing to accomplishment everything that he has
undertaken in history according to his Spirit in the matter of justice and
peace.
Although Christians put all their best energies into preventing
war or stopping it, they do not deceive themselves about their ability to cause
peace to triumph, nor about the effect of their efforts to this end. They
therefore concern themselves with all human initiatives in favour of peace and
very often take part in them; but they regard them with realism and humility.
One could almost say that they "relativize" them in two senses: they
relate them both to the sinful condition of humanity and to God's saving plan.
In the first place, Christians are aware that plans based on aggression,
domination and the manipulation of others lurk in human hearts, and sometimes
even secretly nourish human intentions, in spite of certain declarations or
manifestations of a pacifist nature. For Christians know that in this world a
totally and permanently peaceful human society is unfortunately a utopia, and
that ideologies that hold up that prospect as easily attainable are based on
hopes that cannot be realized, whatever the reason behind them. It is a question
of a mistaken view of the human condition, a lack of application in considering
the question as a whole; or it may be a case of evasion in order to calm fear,
or in still other cases a matter of calculated self-interest. Christians are
convinced, if only because they have learned from personal experience, that
these deceptive hopes lead straight to the false peace of totalitarian regimes.
But this realistic view in no way prevents Christ ians
from working for peace; instead, it stirs up their ardour, for they also know
that Christ's victory over deception, hate and death gives those in love with
peace a more decisive motive for action than what the most generous theories
about man have to offer; Christ's victory likewise gives a hope more surely
based than any hope held out by the most audacious dreams.
This is why Christians, even as they strive to resist and
prevent every form of warfare, have no hesitation in recalling that, in the name
of an elementary requirement of justice, peoples have a right and even a duty to
protect their existence and freedom by proportionate means against an unjust
aggressor (cf. Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 79). However, in view of the
difference between classical warfare and nuclear or bacteriological war a difference
so to speak of nature and in view of the scandal of the arms race seen against
the background of the needs of the Third World, this right, which is very real
in principle, only underlines the urgency for world society to equip itself with
effective means of negotiation. In this way the nuclear terror that haunts our
time can encourage us to enrich our common heritage with a very simple discovery
that is within our reach, namely that war is the most barbarous and least
effective way of resolving conflicts. More than ever before, human society is
forced to provide itself with the means of consultation and dialogue which it
needs in order to survive, and therefore with the institutions necessary for
building up justice and peace.
May it also realize that this work is something beyond human
powers!
Prayer for peace
13. Throughout this message, I have appealed to the
responsibility of people of good will, especially Christians, because God has
indeed entrusted peace to men and women. With the realism and hope that
faith makes possible, I have tried to draw the attention of citizens and leaders
to a certain number of achievements or attitudes that are already feasible and
capable of giving a solid foundation to peace. But, over and above or even in
the midst of this necessary activity, which might seem to depend primarily on
people, peace is above all a gift of God - something that must never be
forgotten - and must always be implored from his mercy.
This conviction is certainly seen to have animated people of all
civilizations who have given peace the first place in their prayers. Its
expression is found in all religions. How many men, having experienced murderous
conflicts and concentration camps, how many women and children, distressed by
wars, have in times past turned to the God of peace! Today, when the perils have
taken on a seriousness all their own by reason of their extent and radical
nature, and when the difficulties of building peace have taken on a new nature
and seem often insoluble, many individuals may spontaneously find themselves
resorting to prayer, even though prayer may be something unfamiliar.
Yes, our future is in the hands of God, who alone gives true
peace. And when human hearts sincerely think of work for peace it is still God's
grace that inspires and strengthens those thoughts. All people are in this sense
invited to echo the sentiments of Saint Francis of Assisi, the eighth centenary
of whose birth we are celebrating: Lord, make us instruments of your peace:
where there is hatred, let us sow love; where there is injury, pardon; when
discord rages, let us build peace.
Christians love to pray for peace, as they make their own the
prayer of so many psalms punctuated by supplications for peace and repeated with
the universal love of Jesus. We have here a shared and very profound element for
all ecumenical activities. Other believers all over the world are also awaiting
from Almighty God the gift of peace, and, more or less consciously, many other
people of good will are ready to make the same prayer in the secret of their
hearts. May fervent supplications thus rise to God from the four corners of the
earth! This will already create a fine unanimity on the road to peace. And who
could doubt that God will hear and grant this cry of his children: Lord, grant
us peace! Grant us your peace!
From the Vatican, 8 December 1981.
JOANNES PAULUS PP. II
|