 |
ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II
TO THE TRIBUNAL OF THE ROMAN ROTA
26 February 1983
1. I am keenly grateful to Monsignor Dean for the noble words
in which he expressed your common sentiments and conveyed the difficulties and
prospects facing the complex activity which you look after with such generous
dedication. This annual meeting is a welcome occasion for extending a cordial
greeting above all to those who exert their energies in this delicate sector
of the Church’s life. Greetings to you, Monsignor Dean, to the college of
prelates auditors who make up the tribunal, the other officials who are part
of it, and the ranks of Rota advocates, whom I see so well represented here. I
am glad to be able to honor with recognition the persons who make the
administration of justice in the name of this Apostolic See their
profession. The circumstance likewise offers me the
opportunity to dwell with you, as is customary, on those aspects of your work
which seem to deserve greater attention year by year. Our encounter today
occurs a few days after the solemn act of promulgating the new Code of Canon
Law. Thus, as I said in the constitution Sacræ disciplinæ leges the
Code: “must be regarded as the essential instrument for the preservation of
the right order, both in individual and social life, and in the Church’s
zeal” (January 25, 1983, in AAS, 75 [1983], p. xi). At
the end of that long and meritorious work of reforming the Church’s laws, I
think that we can repeat - with a retrospective judgment of their truth - the
words that my predecessor Paul VI addressed to you on February 12, 1968,
precisely concerning revision of the Code: “Now, as in the past, the vast
and varied heritage of the experience gained by your tribunal during recent
years puts you - today as in the past - in a position to furnish much solid
material for the new legislation. Not only, as is evident, the part dedicated
to the structure and dynamics of the canonical trial and the teaching on
marriage, but also to the basic and fundamental principles and institutes of
canon law itself can be singled out in a more exact manner and defined in more
certain terms with the doctrinal contributions contained in your decisions.
Through your judgments recent developments in the civil law of nations and
also recent findings of medicine and psychiatry will find their way into the
new Code of Canon Law. The profoundly human outlook that inspires your
judgments will help to clarify the mystery of what it means to be a human and
a Christian today - to whom this new Code will be addressed. The new
legislation should offer clear guidelines and effective helps in courageously
living the truth of the Gospel and in fulfilling one’s own vocation in the
Church of Christ” (February 12, 1968, supra p. 92). It
seems to me that the expectations of Paul VI have been amply realized in the
legislative texts of the new Code. The ecclesiological doctrine is in
conformity with the orientations of Vatican II, and the pastoral indications
contained in it assure us of a stimulating wealth and concrete adherence to
reality. They deserve to be carefully studied in order to be generously
applied to the Church’s life. 2. Now I desire in particular
to lay stress upon certain elements concerning the important and irreplaceable
work which the Sacred Roman Rota, the Roman Pontiff’s ordinary tribunal,
performs for the good of the whole Church. I refer above all to
what the new Code of Canon Law affirms in can. 221, §1: “Christ’s
faithful may lawfully vindicate and defend the rights they enjoy in the
Church, before the competent ecclesiastical forum in accordance with the law.”
The second paragraph is more explicit: “If any members of Christ’s
faithful are summoned to trial by the competent authority, they have the right
to be judged according to the provisions of the law, to be applied with
equity.” The Church has always affirmed and promoted the rights of the
faithful, and in the new Code, indeed, she has promulgated them as a
fundamental charter (cf. cc. 208-223). She thus offers opportune
juridical guarantees for protecting and safeguarding adequately the desired
reciprocity between the rights and duties inscribed in the dignity of the
person of the Christian faithful (christifidelis). The
ministry of the ecclesiastical judge is therefore that of interpreter of
justice and law. Moreover, as I said in my discourse of February 17, 1979, “The
ecclesiastical judge, therefore, will not only bear in mind that the primary
requirement of justice is to respect persons, but will also look beyond
justice and strive for equity and, beyond this, for charity” (February 17,
1979, supra pp. 154-155). 3. But the safeguarding of
the personal rights of all members of the People of God, faithful and pastors,
should not diminish the promotion of that ecclesial communion that is laid
down as the prime exigence of all ecclesiastical legislation and which ought
to guide all the activity of the People of God. The Church is indeed described
as the sacrament of unity (LG, no. 1). So, therefore, if
Christians as I noted in the same discourse, “accept the inspiration of the
Spirit and acknowledge the need of a profound conversion to the Church, the
affirmation and exercise of their rights will be transformed into an
acceptance of duties with regard to unity and solidarity so that the higher
values of the common good may be achieved” (February 17, 1979, supra p.
156). The striving for the common good and toward the
co-responsibility of all Church members in building that highly articulated
society - which is the bearer of salvation to all mankind - demands respect
for the roles of one and all, according to each one’s juridical status in
the Church, and the effective activity of all public functions imbued with sacred
power (potestas sacra). All this is in view of a more profound
redemption of humans from the slavery of sin and from the myth of a deceptive
liberty. “Recalling the principle of authority and the need for a juridical
order detracts nothing from the value of freedom or from the esteem in which
it ought to be held,” Paul VI affirmed in his discourse of January 29, 1970,
“Rather it stresses what is needed to safeguard effectively t he common good -
including
the basic good of exercising freedom - which only a well-ordered social order
can adequately guarantee. As a matter of fact, what would freedom be worth to
an individual if it were not protected by wise and suitable laws? The great
Arpinian had good reason to say: 'Magistrates make the laws, judges interpret
them; all of us, therefore, are servants of the law, so that we may be free’
“ (supra p. 101). In the constitution Sacræ
disciplinæ leges, I also referred to the false opposition between
liberty, grace, and charism, and the law of the Church; I declared: “Granted
this, it is sufficiently clear that the purpose of the Code is not in any way
to replace faith, grace, charisms, and above all charity in the life of the
Church and of Christ’s faithful. On the contrary, the Code rather looks
toward the achievement of order in ecclesial society, such that while
attributing a primacy to love, grace, and the charisms, it facilitates at the
same time an orderly development in the life both of the ecclesial society and
of the individual persons who belong to it” (AAS, 75 [1983] p. xi). 4.
Concerning the function of judges and the judicial activity in the Church, it
is necessary to point out that - apart from the directive role that they play
by their very nature in every process - judges undoubtedly enjoy a freedom of
decision, which is granted to them by the legislator. This refers to both
their qualifications and competence (cf. cc. 1420-1421) and precise
observance of procedure in order to guarantee the correct administration of
justice, and it also refers to the judges’ conscience, for it requires not
only “moral certainty about the matter to be decided in the judgment,” but
it warns them as well that they “must conscientiously weigh the evidence”
(c. 1608, §§1-3). If it is true that the new Code
clearly imposes the obligation of rapidly bringing all processes of first and
second instance to completion (see c. 1453), this must not result in the
detriment to justice and protection of the rights of all the parties to the
cause and the community of which they are members. This requirement becomes
the more urgent inasmuch as the jurisprudence of the Sacred Roman Rota, as
that of the other apostolic tribunals, and also the practice of the
dicasteries of the Roman Curia are considered to be guides and orientation for
interpretation of the law in some cases (see c. 20). Along this line, the
jurisprudence of the Rota has acquired increasing authority - not only moral
but judicial authority - in the Church’s history in reference to the
evolution of the norms. Especially
during the transitional phase between the old and the new canon law, the Rota
has played a decisive role in gathering and translating into decisions - which
obviously constitute laws only for the matters and persons for which they were
pronounced (see c. 16, §3). The most significant instances since Vatican
Council II are above all in what concerns the contents of Christian marriage
(cf. GS, nos. 47-52).
5. It is necessary for this function
of the Sacred Rota to continue and increase though the lofty and exemplary
quality of the work carried out by all who labor in your and my tribunal, so
as to guarantee ever greater fidelity to the Church’s doctrine concerning
the essence and properties of marriage, which are for the rest amply
represented with theological richness in the new Code of Canon Law (cf. cc.
1055-1165).
While respecting a healthy pluralism
that reflects the Church’s universality, the function of the jurisprudence
of the Rota is indeed that of leading toward more convergent unity and
substantial uniformity in safeguarding the essential contents of canonical
marriage, which the spouses, the ministers of the sacrament, celebrate in
adherence to the depth and wealth of the mystery, in reciprocal profession of
faith before God. I said in fact at the general audience last January 18: “In
this domain men and women are the artisans of the actions which in themselves
have definite meanings. They are therefore the artisans of their actions and
at the same time authors of their meaning. The sum of those meanings
constitutes in a certain sense the generality of the language of the body
that the spouses decide to speak to each other as ministers of the sacrament
of marriage. The sign they effect through the words of marriage consent is not
a purely immediate and transitory sign, but is a prospective sign reproducing
a lasting effect, that is, the marriage bond, which is exclusive and
indissoluble for all the days of my life, that is, until death. In this
perspective they have to fill up that sign with the manifold content offered
by the conjugal and family communion of persons, and also with the content
originating with the language of the body that is continuously reread
in truth. In this way the essential truth of the sign will remain organically
united with the ethos of conjugal behavior.”
I would therefore express the hope
to you, eminent weighers of the law and sage interpreters of its rules, that
in this judiciary task as well, which is vital for the Church, you should
contribute to seeing that the faithful, in full acknowledgement of the moral
order and in respect of genuine liberty, “may become . . . witnesses to that
mystery of devoted love which the Lord in his death and resurrection revealed
to the world” (GS, no. 52).
With these wishes, while I call the special divine protection
down upon you, that you may go on with your work of service to the Church with
that conscience of loftiest responsibility and total dedication which ought to
distinguish faithful collaborators of the pope and the Holy See, which you
are, I impart from my heart, as a pledge of constant benevolence, my apostolic
benediction.
© Copyright 1983 - Libreria Editrice Vaticana
|