|
CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
LETTER TO THE BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONCERNING
THE RECEPTION OF HOLY COMMUNION BY THE DIVORCED AND REMARRIED MEMBERS OF THE
FAITHFUL
Your Excellency
1. The International Year of the Family is a particularly important
occasion to discover anew the many signs of the Church's love and concern for
the family(1) and, at the same time, to present once more the priceless riches
of Christian marriage, which is the basis of the family.
2. In this context the difficulties and sufferings of those faithful in
irregular marriage situations merit special attention(2). Pastors are called to
help them experience the charity of Christ and the maternal closeness of the
Church, receiving them with love, exhorting them to trust in God's mercy and
suggesting, with prudence and respect, concrete ways of conversion and sharing
in the life of the community of the Church(3).
3. Aware however that authentic understanding and genuine mercy are never
separated from the truth(4), pastors have the duty to remind these faithful of
the Church's doctrine concerning the celebration of the sacraments, in
particular, the reception of the Holy Communion. In recent years, in various
regions, different pastoral solutions in this area have been suggested according
to which, to be sure, a general admission of divorced and remarried to
Eucharistic communion would not be possible, but the divorced and remarried
members of the faithful could approach Holy Communion in specific cases when
they consider themselves authorised according to a judgement of conscience to do
so. This would be the case, for example, when they had been abandoned
completely unjustly, although they sincerely tried to save the previous
marriage, or when they are convinced of the nullity of their previous marriage,
although unable to demonstrate it in the external forum or when they have gone
through a long period of reflexion and penance, or also when for morally valid
reasons they cannot satisfy the obligation to separate.
In some places, it has also been proposed that in order objectively to
examine their actual situation, the divorced and remarried would have to consult
a prudent and expert priest. This priest, however, would have to respect their
eventual decision to approach Holy Communion, without this implying an official
authorisation.
In these and similar cases it would be a matter of a tolerant and benevolent
pastoral solution in order to do justice to the different situations of the
divorced and remarried.
4. Even if analogous pastoral solutions have been proposed by a few Fathers
of the Church and in some measure were practiced, nevertheless these never
attained the consensus of the Fathers and in no way came to constitute the
common doctrine of the Church nor to determine her discipline. It falls to the
universal Magisterium, in fidelity to Sacred Scripture and Tradition, to teach
and to interpret authentically the depositum fidei.
With respect to the aforementioned new pastoral proposals, this Congregation
deems itself obliged therefore to recall the doctrine and discipline of the
Church in this matter. In fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ(5), the Church
affirms that a new union cannot be recognised as valid if the preceding marriage
was valid. If the divorced are remarried civilly, they find themselves in a
situation that objectively contravenes God's law. Consequently, they cannot
receive Holy Communion as long as this situation persists(6).
This norm is not at all a punishment or a discrimination against the
divorced and remarried, but rather expresses an objective situation that of
itself renders impossible the reception of Holy Communion: "They are unable
to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life
objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and his Church which is
signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special
pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful
would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church's teaching about the
indissolubility of marriage"(7).
The faithful who persist in such a situation may receive Holy Communion only
after obtaining sacramental absolution, which may be given only "to those
who, repenting of having broken the sign of the Covenant and of fidelity to
Christ, are sincerely ready to undertake a way of life that is no longer in
contradiction to the indissolubility of marriage. This means, in practice, that
when for serious reasons, for example, for the children's upbringing, a man and
a woman cannot satisfy the obligation to separate, they 'take on themselves the
duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper
to married couples'"(8). In such a case they may receive Holy Communion as
long as they respect the obligation to avoid giving scandal.
5. The doctrine and discipline of the Church in this matter, are amply
presented in the post-conciliar period in the Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris
Consortio. The Exhortation, among other things, reminds pastors that out of
love for the truth they are obliged to discern carefully the different
situations and exhorts them to encourage the participation of the divorced and
remarried in the various events in the life of the Church. At the same time it
confirms and indicates the reasons for the constant and universal practice, "founded
on Sacred Scripture, of not admitting the divorced and remarried to Holy
Communion"(9). The structure of the Exhortation and the tenor of its words
give clearly to understand that this practice, which is presented as binding,
cannot be modified because of different situations.
6. Members of the faithful who live together as husband and wife with
persons other than their legitimate spouses may not receive Holy Communion.
Should they judge it possible to do so, pastors and confessors, given the
gravity of the matter and the spiritual good of these persons(10) as well as the
common good of the Church, have the serious duty to admonish them that such a
judgment of conscience openly contradicts the Church's teaching(11). Pastors in
their teaching must also remind the faithful entrusted to their care of this
doctrine.
This does not mean that the Church does not take to heart the situation of
these faithful, who moreover are not excluded from ecclesial communion. She is
concerned to accompany them pastorally and invite them to share in the life of
the Church in the measure that is compatible with the dispositions of divine
law, from which the Church has no power to dispense(12). On the other hand, it
is necessary to instruct these faithful so that they do not think their
participation in the life of the Church is reduced exclusively to the question
of the reception of the Eucharist. The faithful are to be helped to deepen
their understanding of the value of sharing in the sacrifice of Christ in the
Mass, of spiritual communion(13), of prayer, of meditation on the Word of God,
and of works of charity and justice(14).
7. The mistaken conviction of a divorced and remarried person that he may
receive Holy Communion normally presupposes that personal conscience is
considered in the final analysis to be able, on the basis of one's own
convictions(15), to come to a decision about the existence or absence of a
previous marriage and the value of the new union. However, such a position is
inadmissable(16). Marriage, in fact, because it is both the image of the spousal
relationship between Christ and his Church as well as the fundamental core and
an important factor in the life of civil society, is essentially a public
reality.
8. It is certainly true that a judgment about one's own dispositions for the
reception of Holy Communion must be made by a properly formed moral conscience.
But it is equally true that the consent that is the foundation of marriage is
not simply a private decision since it creates a specifically ecclesial and
social situation for the spouses, both individually and as a couple. Thus the
judgment of conscience of one's own marital situation does not regard only the
immediate relationship between man and God, as if one could prescind from the
Church's mediation, that also includes canonical laws binding in conscience.
Not to recognise this essential aspect would mean in fact to deny that marriage
is a reality of the Church, that is to say, a sacrament.
9. In inviting pastors to distinguish carefully the various situations of
the divorced and remarried, the Exhortation Familiaris Consortio recalls
the case of those who are subjectively certain in conscience that their previous
marriage, irreparably broken, had never been valid(17). It must be discerned
with certainty by means of the external forum established by the Church whether
there is objectively such a nullity of marriage. The discipline of the Church,
while it confirms the exclusive competence of ecclesiastical tribunals with
respect to the examination of the validity of the marriage of Catholics, also
offers new ways to demonstrate the nullity of a previous marriage, in order to
exclude as far as possible every divergence between the truth verifiable in the
judicial process and the objective truth known by a correct conscience(18).
Adherence to the Church's judgment and observance of the existing discipline
concerning the obligation of canonical form necessary for the validity of the
marriage of Catholics are what truly contribute to the spiritual welfare of the
faithful concerned. The Church is in fact the Body of Christ and to live in
ecclesial communion is to live in the Body of Christ and to nourish oneself with
the Body of Christ. With the reception of the sacrament of the Eucharist,
communion with Christ the Head can never be separated from communion with his
members, that is, with his Church. For this reason, the sacrament of our union
with Christ is also the sacrament of the unity of the Church. Receiving
Eucharistic Communion contrary to ecclesial communion is therefore in itself a
contradiction. Sacramental communion with Christ includes and presupposes the
observance, even if at times difficult, of the order of ecclesial communion, and
it cannot be right and fruitful if a member of the faithful, wishing to approach
Christ directly, does not respect this order.
10. In keeping with what has been said above, the desire expressed by the
Synod of Bishops, adopted by the Holy Father John Paul II as his own and put
into practice with dedication and with praiseworthy initiatives by bishops,
priests, religious and lay faithful is yet to be fully realized, namely, with
solicitous charity to do everything that can be done to strengthen in the love
of Christ and the Church those faithful in irregular marriage situations. Only
thus will it be possible for them fully to receive the message of Christian
marriage and endure in faith the distress of their situation. In pastoral action
one must do everything possible to ensure that this is understood not to be a
matter of discrimination but only of absolute fidelity to the will of Christ who
has restored and entrusted to us anew the indissolubility of marriage as a gift
of the Creator. It will be necessary for pastors and the community of the
faithful to suffer and to love in solidarity with the persons concerned so that
they may recognise in their burden the sweet yoke and the light burden of
Jesus(19). Their burden is not sweet and light in the sense of being small or
insignificant, but becomes light because the Lord - and with him the whole
Church - shares it. It is the task of pastoral action, which has to be carried
out with total dedication, to offer this help, founded in truth and in love
together.
United with you in dedication to the collegial task of making the truth of
Jesus Christ shine in the life and activity of the Church, I remain Yours
devotedly in the Lord
Joseph Card. Ratzinger Prefect
+ Alberto Bovone Titular Archbishop of Caesarea in
Numidia Secretary
During an audience granted to the Cardinal Prefect, the Supreme Pontiff
John Paul II gave his approval to this letter, drawn up in the ordinary session
of this Congregation, and ordered its publication.
Given at Rome, from the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, 14 September 1994, Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross.
(1) Cf. John Paul II, Letter to Families (2 February 1994), n. 3.
(2) Cf. John Paul II, Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio
(22 November 1981) nn. 79-84: AAS 74 (1982) 180-186.
(3) Cf. ibid., n. 84: AAS 74 (1982) 185; Letter to Families,
n. 5; Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1651.
(4) Cf. Paul VI, Encyclical Letter Humanæ Vitæ, n. 29:
AAS 60 (1968) 501; John Paul II, Apostolic Exhortation Reconciliatio et Pænitentia,
n. 34: AAS 77 (1985) 272, Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor, n. 95:
AAS 85 (1993) 1208.
(5) Mk 10:11-12: "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another,
commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries
another, she commits adultery."
(6) Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1650; cf. also n.
1640 and the Council of Trent, sess. XXIV: DS 1797-1812.
(7) Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, n. 84: AAS 74
(1982) 185-186.
(8) Ibid., n. 84: AAS 74 (1982) 186; cf. John Paul II, Homily on
the Occasion of the Closure of the Sixth Synod of Bishops, n. 7: AAS 72
(1980) 1082.
(9) Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, n. 84: AAS 74
(1982) 185.
(10) Cf. 1 Cor 11:27-29.
(11) Cf. Code of Canon Law, 978 §2.
(12) Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1640.
(13) Cf. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Letter to the
Bishops of the Catholic Church on Certain Questions concerning the Minister of
the Eucharist, III/4: AAS 75 (1983) 1007; St Teresa of Avila, The Way of
Perfection 35,1; St Alphonsus de' Liguori, Visite al SS. Sacramento e a
Maria Santissima.
(14) Cf. Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, n. 84: AAS 74
(1982) 185.
(15) Cf. Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor, n. 55: AAS 85 (1993)
1178.
(16) Cf. Code of Canon Law, 1085 § 2.
(17) Cf. Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, n. 84: AAS 74
(1982) 185.
(18) Cf. Code of Canon Law 1536 § 2 and 1679 and Code of
the Canons of the Eastern Churches 1217 § 2 and 1365 concerning the
probative force of the depositions of the parties in such processes.
(19) Cf. Matt 11:30.
|