While press reports of international waters often focus on conflict, what has
been more encouraging is that, throughout the world, water also induces
cooperation, even in particularly hostile basins, and even as disputes rage over
other issues. This has been true from the Jordan (Arabs and Israelis) to the
Indus (Indians and Pakistanis) to the Kura-Araks (Georgians, Armenians, and
Azeris).
Despite research that finds repeatedly and empirically that water-related
cooperation overwhelms conflict over the last fifty years, prevailing theories
fail to explain this phenomenon. Certainly, there is a long history of
conflicts over, or related to, shared freshwater resources. But there is also a
long, and in many ways deeper, history of water-related cooperation. Why
do countries that share a basin cooperate on water, even when they will not
cooperate over other issues? Here is a resource on which we all depend, which
fluctuates wildly in space and time, and for which there is little guidance in
international law. By any quantitative measure, water should be the most
conflictive resources, not an elixir that drives enemies to craft
functioning and resilient institutional arrangements.
Studies offer economic, environmental, or strategic rationale to explain this
“hydro-cooperation,” but none seems completely adequate. Prevailing wisdom in
both the science and policy of water resources seems not to provide the
foundation to be able to answer this clearly ethical question. Perhaps some part
of the answer lies not in the world of rationality, but rather in the ethical
and spiritual dimensions of water conflict resolution.
Work Plan
The workshop will center on the process of transformation in negotiations – the
point at which parties move from thinking of themselves as representing
countries, to perceiving more broadly the needs of all stakeholders within a
basin. This is a critical juncture in negotiations, where movement from
“rights-based” to “needs-based” to “interest-based” negotiations suddenly
becomes possible. In international basins, this transformation may normally
take years or even decades, during which time political tensions are
exacerbated, ecosystems go unprotected, and water is generally managed, at best,
inefficiently. This negotiation transformation may, however, have a corollary
in spiritual transformation. Every spiritual tradition in the world is devoted
to a very similar process: that is to get individuals to move from thinking
about their needs as individuals – their immediate wants and desires – to
addressing more of their obligations to society and humanity.
The workshop will be structure as a dialog, then, between the worlds of
spiritual transformation and water conflict prevention and resolution. Blocks
of discussion time around critical questions, led off by the commissioned author
of a thematic briefing, will center on questions of mutual concern: Might the
world of spiritual transformation have tools or approaches that may be tapped to
help bolster the difficult dynamics of international environmental
negotiations? Could addressing the ethical core of negotiations supplement the
only partially successful tactics of economic development or environmental
protection? Does the rich record of successful water negotiations offer
approaches to other complex political issues, many of which are rooted in
religious differences? How do the world's religions address environmental
protection, and how does global water management address spiritual needs of
water stakeholders?
Details
The sponsoring institutions will hold a focused workshop on these issues on
13-15 October 2004 in Vatican City. This workshop will bring together 25
invited discussants familiar with international water issues, the international
negotiations process, or the process of transformations in political or
spiritual debate. Modeled after a highly successful meeting that brought
together experts in international water issues and arms control negotiations,
the expectation is that this workshop will help identify mechanisms for reducing
the risks of conflicts over shared water resources, improve ongoing efforts
around the world to negotiate over shared water resources, and develop new tools
for conflict resolution.
Blocks of discussion time will center around critical questions, led off by a
thematic briefing. Topics will be raised by the participants, but might
include:
- Might the world of spiritual transformation have tools or approaches that may be
tapped to help bolster the difficult dynamics of international environmental
negotiations?
- Could addressing the ethical core of negotiations supplement the more common
inducements to cooperate of economic development or environmental protection,
which have shown only partial success?
- Does the rich record of successful water negotiations offer approaches to other
complex political issues, many of which are rooted in religious differences?
- How do the world's religions address environmental protection, and how does
global water management address spiritual needs of water stakeholders?
- What does universality of water offer to applying faith-based principles in
negotiations?
- What does personal transformation offer to the process of watershed
transformation;
- How does personal faith impact decision-making; if greatly, can universal values
be more explicitly invoked to facilitate negotiations?
Conference organizers and selected participants will present a series of papers
on the topic at the Second Israel-Palestinian International Conference on Water
for Life in the Middle East, to be held in Rome October 9-12, 2004. The Middle
East, as a hub of spiritual traditions as diverse as Judaism, Islam,
Christianity, and the Bahai faith, as well as the home of some of the world’s
most complex processes of water conflict resolution, is uniquely positioned to
benefit from the work done at this meeting.
In addition, the findings will be published in various forms in appropriate
outlets, including as a report of the Pacific Institute and Oregon State
University, as journal or popular articles, and as recommendations for water
mediators.
For further information:
Peter H. Gleick, Pacific Institute, pgleick@pipeline.com
Aaron T. Wolf, Oregon State University, wolfa@geo.orst.edu
Tor Wennesland, International Water Academy, torw@thewateracademy.org
Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, Pontificia Accademia delle Scienze, academy.sciences@acdscience.va