Presentation to the Vatican Sala Stampa
of His Eminence Edward Idris Cardinal Cassidy
President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity
25 June 1998
1. It is for me a pleasure and source of much satisfaction to
present today a document declaring that a consensus on fundamental truths
regarding the doctrine of justification has been reached in the dialogue
between the Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation.
2. This document is the result of a long process of intense
dialogue under the auspices of the Pontifical Council for Promoting
Christian Unity and the Lutheran World Federation. It must be considered
without any doubt an outstanding achievement of the ecumenical movement
and a milestone on the way to the restoration of full, visible unity among
the disciples of the one Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
3. To put this achievement in perspective, it is necessary to
recall that the doctrine of justification was a central issue in the
dispute between Martin Luther and the Church authorities in the 16th
Century. The contrasting presentations and understandings of this
fundamental Christian doctrine became the subject of condemnations both on
the part of the Council of Trent and the Lutheran Confessions. The
consensus now achieved will be of importance, moreover, not only for
Catholic-Lutheran relations and future dialogue, but also for progress in
the search for unity between Catholics and other communities coming out of
the Reformation controversies.
4. The theological dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, at
the international level, began soon after the close of the Second Vatican
Council, in 1967. Three phases of dialogue have been completed and a
fourth is in progress. From the first phase of this international
dialogue, it became more and more clear that studies and dialogue by
Catholic and Lutheran scholars had begun to show that there was an
emerging agreement on the doctrine of justification. Thus the report of
the First phase of dialogue in 1972, the so-called Malta Report,
stated that "Today ... a far reaching consensus is developing in the
interpretation of justification" (N° 26). The dialogue statement
All under One Christ, 1980 put it even more strongly: "A
broad consensus emerges in the doctrine of justification, which was
decisively important for the Reformation" (N° 4). The dialogue
called the doctrine of justification "the central point of
controversy in the Sixteenth Century" (The Ministry in the
Church, 1981, N° 9). The whole third phase of dialogue examined
this doctrine more at length and in reference to the Church (Church
and Justification: Understanding the Church in the Light of the Doctrine
of Justification, 1994).
Important studies emerged by some Lutheran/Catholic national dialogues
which were used in preparing the report, just mentioned, of the third
phase of dialogue. Those included the American study Justification by
Faith, and the German study The Condemnations of the Reformation
Era, Do They Still Divide? All of these contributed to paving the way
for the Joint Declaration. The Joint Declaration is, in fact, not a new
study. Rather, it brings together in a concise way, the essential findings
of the studies done previously, and seen especially in the dialogue
reports just mentioned.
5. In 1994 a group of theologians, appointed respectively by the
Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the Lutheran World
Federation, produced a first version of a project of a joint declaration
on the doctrine of justification. This began a study process covering
almost four years, during which that version underwent two revisions in
1996 and in 1997, before being officially submitted to the Holy See and
the members of the Lutheran World Federation for approval.
On the Catholic side, this study involved particularly the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Pontifical Council for Promoting
Christian unity and the final result which I have the honour to present
today is the fruit of intense collaboration between these two dicasteries.
The Pontifical Council for Promoting Chrisitan Unity was considerably
helped in its study of the first version by the comments of a number of
Episcopal Conferences in places where there are significant numbers of
Lutherans and Catholics living side by side, and especially by those
Conferences which have been engaged at the national level with
corresponding Lutheran churches.
6. As you can see from the text of the Joint Declaration,
the consensus reached is expressed in a particular style. There is for
each of the questions discussed a common affirmation, followed by an
explanation on the part of each of the dialogue partners, indicating how
their traditional explications of the point in question are in harmony
with the common statement.
There are 44 common declarations, covering basic truths on justification.
The agreement reached on these allows us to say that a high level of
consensus has been reached and further to state that where such consensus
has been reached the condemnations levelled at one another in the 16th
century no longer apply to the respective partner today.
In this connection, I should perhaps point out that we cannot of course
erase these condemnations from history. We can, however, now state that,
in so far as a consensus on the understanding of basic truths articulated
in the Joint Declaration has been achieved, the corresponding
condemnations found in the Lutheran Confessions and in the Council of
Trent no longer apply.
7. At the same time this Joint Declaration has limits. It
is one important step forward, but it does not pretend to resolve all the
issues that Lutherans and Catholics need to face together on their
pilgrimage out of separation, and toward full visible unity. The Joint
Declaration itself speaks of "questions of varying importance which
need further clarification. These include, among other topics, the
relationship between the Word of God and church doctrine, as well as
ecclesiology, authority in the church, ministry, the sacraments, and the
relation between justification and social ethics" (N° 43).
8. In affirming that a consensus in fundamental truths on the
doctrine of Justification has indeed been reached, the Catholic Church is
issuing an accompanying explanatory Note in which certain points regarding
the document are being clarified for the benefit of the members of the
Catholic Church, and as a contribution towards overcoming the divergences
that still exist.
You have a copy of this Note, but I should like to indicate briefly and
explain its contents.
Under the title "Declaration" it is clearly stated that "a
considerable agreement has been reached" on a question that has been
for centuries so controversial. Indeed "it is rightly stated that
there is a consensus in fundamental truths of the doctrine of
justification". At the same time, the Catholic Church is of the
opinion that we cannot yet speak of a consensus such as to eliminate every
difference between Catholics and Lutherans in the understanding of
justification. And as a matter of fact the Joint Declaration
itself refers to some of these differences.
Under the second heading "Clarifications", the Catholic
Church indicates several points that need further study. The major
difficulties are to be found in paragraph 4.4 of the Joint Declaration
concerning the justified person as sinner. We have some difficulty in
seeing how the explanation given in N° 29 regarding the Lutheran
understanding of the justified person as sinful can be fully compatible
with the Catholic doctrine explained in N° 30. The Lutheran
explanation seems still to contradict the Catholic understanding of
baptism in which all that can properly be called sin is taken away.
Concupiscence remains of course in the justified, but for Catholics this
cannot be properly called sin, while in N° 29 it is stated that for
Lutherans it is truly sin. Moreover, the Statement in N° 22 that "God
no longer imputes to the justified their sins" does not seem an
adequate explanation of the Catholic understanding of the interior
transformation that takes place in the justified person. The term "Opposition
to God" that is used in NN° 28-30 is understood differently by
Catholics and Lutherans and so becomes, in fact, equivocal. For these
reasons it is difficult to see how, in the current state of the
presentation, given in the Joint Declaration, we can say that the
Lutheran doctrine of "simul iustus et peccator" is not
touched by the anathemas of the Tridentine decrees on original sin and
justification.
One of the most discussed points in the Joint Declaration has been
the question considered under N° 18, concerning the Lutheran
understanding of justification as criterion for the life and practice of
the Church. For Lutherans this doctrine has taken on an altogether
particular significance. The Joint Declaration states clearly that
for Catholics also the doctrine of justification "is an indispensable
criterion which constantly serves to orient all the teaching and practice
of our churches to Christ". Catholics, however, "see themselves
as bound by several criteria" and our Note indicates what those
criteria are by stating that, "according to Scripture and already
from the time of the Fathers of the Church, the message of justification
has been organically integrated into the fundamental criterion of the regula
fidei, that is the confession of the one God in three persons,
christologically centered and rooted in the living Church and its
sacramental".
The Catholic Church has noted with satisfaction that N° 21, in
conformity with canon 4 of the Decree on Justification of the Council of
Trent, states that man can refuse grace; but it must also be affirmed
that, with this freedom to refuse, there is also in the justified person a
new capacity to adhere to the divine will, a capacity that is rightly
called cooperatio. Given this understanding and noting that in N°
17, Lutherans and Catholics share the common conviction that the new life
comes from the divine mercy and not from any merit of our own, it is
difficult to see how the term "mere passive" can be used
by the Lutherans in this regard, and how this phrase can be compatible
with the affirmation by the Lutherans in N°21 of the full personal
involvement in faith. A clarification would therefore seem necessary in
order to determine more exactly the degree of consensus achieved in this
regard.
The Catholic Church also maintains with Lutherans that these good works
of the justified are always the fruit of grace. But at the same time, and
without in any way diminishing the totally divine initiative, they are the
fruit of man, justified and interiorly transformed. We can therefore say
that eternal life is, at one and the same time, grace and the reward given
by God for good works and merits.
In pursuing this study further, it will be necessary to treat also the
sacrament of penance, through which the sinner can be justified anew.
And then in a third section, the Note indicates some Prospects for
Future Work. The hope is expressed that the present important step
forward towards agreement on justification may be followed by further
studies that will make possible a satisfactory clarification of the
divergences that still exist, some of which concern aspects of substance
and are therefore not all mutually compatible, as affirmed on the contrary
in N° 40. Particularly desirable would be a deeper reflection on the
biblical foundation that is the common basis of the doctrine of
justification both for Lutherans and Catholics.
And the Note finally expresses the wish that Catholics and Lutherans
might seek to find a language which can make the doctrine of justification
more intelligible also for the men and women of our day.
9. In conclusion, I wish to stress that the consensus reached on
the doctrine of justification, despite its limitations, virtually resolves
a long disputed question at the close of the twentieth century, and on the
eve of the new millennium. It is a response to Pope John Paul II's appeal
in Tertio Millennio Adveniente that "the approaching end of
the second millennium demands of everyone an examination of conscience and
the promotion of fitting ecumenical initiatives, so that we can celebrate
the Great Jubilee, if not completely united, at least much closer to
overcoming the divisions of the second millennium" (N° 34),
and will be an enormous encouragement to Catholics and Lutherans as they
continue to work in the years ahead for the visible unity to which the
Lord is calling us. Indeed, it will be an encouragement to the whole
ecumenical movement. It will show that patient work to overcome
difficulties through dialogue can achieve results that go far beyond what
could have been hoped for when the dialogue began.
There will be a formal signing of the Joint Declaration and a
celebration of the consensus achieved sometime in the autumn. In the near
future as part of the process of reception and dissemination of the
document, the Pontifical Council will be forwarding a copy of the Joint
Declaration, together with other relevant documentation to the
Episcopal Conferences for their information, examination and study.
25 June 1998