INTERVENTION BY THE HOLY SEE AT THE FIFTH
MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE OF WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO)
ADDRESS OF MSGR. FRANK J.DEWANE*
Cancun, Mexico Saturday, 13 September 2003
Mr. Chairman, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Delegation of the Holy See wishes to begin by expressing
thanks and congratulations to President Vicente Fox and to the people of Mexico
for the warm welcome and excellent arrangement that have been made for us on
this occasion. My Delegation extends its appreciation also to the Chairman of
the General Committee and the Director General for their tireless efforts in
preparation for the Conference.
This Fifth Ministerial Conference of WTO represents a time of
hope. But for this hope to be realized, all here present must remain faithful to
the promises and commitments made to the poor in Doha. There has been
unsatisfactory progress in the areas of trade for the poorest countries. Bold
and decisive action is needed that will have positive implications for
development. As stated by His Holiness Pope John Paul II, "Promises made to the
poor should be considered particularly binding" and any breach of faith in this
regard is "especially frustrating for them" when it pertains to "promises which
they see as vital to their well-being".
The participation of the Holy See as an Observer in the World
Trade Organization springs from its characteristic and constant concern for
humanity. It takes a profound interest in and acts on all issues that affect the
dignity of the human person and participates in numerous areas of policy
development, including that of trade, focussing on the development of the
person, peoples and society. Further, the presence of the Holy See at this Fifth
Ministerial Conference demonstrates the importance it attributes to the activity
of the WTO, to this midterm review process and to the issue of trade.
Trade should benefit people and not just markets and economies.
Trade rules, therefore, not withstanding their technical aspects, have a
political and social nature, with deep and lasting consequences in the life of
humanity. It is those often found in smaller economies who are most in need of
an equitable, rules-based system of trade in which all can participate and
benefit on the basis of the highest achievable equality of opportunity. But, no
set of rules is fair by itself. They must conform to the demands of social
justice while enabling and fostering human development.
The recent decision on the implementation of paragraph six of
the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health is a positive step
in carrying out the Doha commitments. The Delegation of the Holy See compliments
all parties that took part in arriving at this crucial and important agreement.
In this context as well as for other issues, the Holy See wishes to note that
the protection of private property, including intellectual property, is
important and must be respected. At the same time all property has a social
mortgage. The intellectual property rights system must exist not only to protect
creative and innovative impetus but also and primarily to serve the common good
of the human family. As a universal common good, intellectual property demands
that control mechanisms should accompany the logic of the market.
Recent developments as regards the Agreement on Agriculture have
given this process new life. However, further impetus is needed. Agriculture
products that are staple foods and on which low-income and poor farmers are
dependent should be given special consideration in the context of tariff
reductions. These reductions in poor countries, along with the effects of export
subsides and domestic supports in and dumping from developed countries, are
particularly harmful for small farmers. Still, any temptation by developing
countries toward a crude protectionist path should be avoided. A balancing
mechanism is needed that will allow for an increase in small farmer production
and productivity as well as for the growth of employment in rural areas. The
issues of food security, basic standard of living and rural development are
legitimate concerns in agricultural negotiations. Special safeguard mechanisms
for poor countries must be developed allowing for temporary action when small
farmers are threatened.
With regard to trade in services, it has to be considered that
the defence and preservation of certain common goods such as the natural and
human environments, cannot be safeguarded simply by market forces since they
touch on fundamental human needs which escape market logic. Water, education and
health, among others, have been traditionally a State responsibility and viewed
as public goods. More efficient services can include involvement of the private
sector, but set within a clear legislative framework with the goal of serving
the public interest.
There exists no lack of proposed modality options regarding
market access for non-agricultural products. The crux of the matter falls on the
issues of tariff peaks, tariff escalation and non-tariff barriers, especially
for products in which poor countries could be competitive (labour intensive
products). Since non-tariff barriers pose a serious threat to further
liberalisation of trade in industrial goods, clarity as to the scope and
treatment of non-tariff barriers must be articulated with due consideration for
weaker economies. In some poor countries industrial development in, for example,
textiles and clothing is one of the most important tools in combating poverty
and fostering development.
In closing, the Holy See Delegation wishes to associate itself
with those who support consideration for the particular needs of the African
continent to experience the development that trade can provide. Africa today
remains a continent at risk, fragile in terms of trade relations and the
corresponding benefits. If the Doha Development Agenda is to be faithful to its
mission, WTO must be solicitous about the needs of African countries. In the
context of a "family of nations" those countries economically more developed can
provide assistance that will allow for attainment of the development which
corresponds to our shared human dignity. Precisely because people have been
endowed with the same extraordinary dignity no one should be reduced to living
without the benefits of trade.
*WT/MIN(03)/ST/147.
L’Osservatore Romano, 15-16.9.2003 p.2.
L'Osservatore Romano. Weekly Edition in English n.42 pp.12, 15.
|