Mr. Chariman,
As we begin the seventh session of the Group of Governmental
Experts, the Delegation of the Holy See would like to offer some methodological
comments of a general nature in order to share with you, Mr Chairman, and with
the Delegations of the States Parties some reasons of satisfaction and also to
rise some questions regarding the present and the future of the CCW.
1. The Holy See expresses its appreciation for the positive
results of the negotiations and for the adoption of a Fifth Protocol regarding
explosive remnants of war. This is a step in the right direction. But some
crucial issues remain to be solved in order to prevent the recurrence of victims
and the damages of past wars. These victims remind us constantly of the
exorbitant cost of any war in general and of the consequences of the choice and
use of some arms in particular. The Holy See is also encouraged by the renewal
of the mandate of the Group of Experts. Other problems equally important as
those of explosive remnants of war are yet to receive adequate attention from
the States Parties.
2. The multilateral negotiations of arms control or of
disarmament still remain slow and long, and results are reached almost always on
the basis of the lowest common denominator. On the contrary, the production of
new conventional arms follows the most advanced and the most rapid scientific
and technological discoveries. The result is that these arms are more and more
devastating and cause useless human suffering for much longer periods of time
than the conflicts themselves. Cluster bombs, which are increasingly being used
in armed conflicts, illustrate tragically this worrying reality. In this context,
States Parties should pay particular attention to this type of sub-munition,
bearing in mind its traumatizing and devasting effects on civilian populations
as well as the negative socio-economic consequences both during and after
hostilities.
3. Mr. Chairman the Holy See is involved in a great number of
countries of all the regions, in initiatives concerning victims of armed
conflicts and their families, including victims of anti-personnel mines and
explosive remnants of war. I do not need to describe the frustration and
discouragement of thousands of volunteer workers who are obliged to repeat over
and over again the job that has already been done and, in some cases, have to
watch the sufferings of the victims without any form of action. It seems to me
inappropriate to limit our work and decisions to the quest solely for remedial
measures. Prevention is surely less costly in terms of human lives and
socio-economic damage. A culture of prevention is the most appropriate in order
to ensure a security which is based on justice, trust and cooperation between
States. For that reason, the right equilibrium should be that of an armament
maintained at the lowest level and whose effects would bring about minimal
suffering and damages. There is no need to add to the failure of war in
resolving problems its success in causing as many victims and as much
unhappiness as possible.
4. Mr. Chairman, the Holy See is prepared to work with you and
with all States Parties in promoting a culture of prevention and adopting new
instruments which will spare us the efforts that are needed to continually heal
the useless sufferings which are caused by these devastating weapons.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
*