INTERVENTION BY THE HOLY SEE AT THE 60th SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS ON: INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS OF THE
PLENARY ON A COUNTER-TERRORISM STRATEGY
ADDRESS OF H.E. MONS. CELESTINO MIGLIORE
New York Thursday, 11 May 2006
Mr President,
My delegation welcomes the timely debate of the report now
before us, in the context of the current impasse in consultations on the
Convention on terrorism. We also support all efforts intended to overcome
difficulties still impeding progress on this important juridical instrument.
Paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Secretary-General’s report rightly
contain a clear condemnation of terrorism based on the assumption that no cause,
no matter how just, can excuse or legitimize the deliberate killing or maiming
of civilians and non-combatants.
Terrorism often takes root in the cultural fragmentation
underlying tensions and divisions that unfortunately we have seen even in the UN
in recent weeks and months. The Holy See therefore remains prepared to take part
in this important debate with a view to finding common ground on which nations
can build effective counter-terrorism strategies.
At the start of this year, Pope Benedict XVI addressed Catholics
and all women and men of good will, inviting them to link their efforts to
reflection, cooperation, dialogue and prayer, intended to overcome terrorism and
build a just and peaceful coexistence in the human family.
Given his conviction that, in analyzing the causes of the
contemporary phenomenon of terrorism, consideration should be given not only to
its political and social causes but also to its deeper cultural, religious and
ideological motivations, the Pope’s invitation has already brought about a
mosaic of debates, initiatives and experiences both in academe and at the grass
roots level throughout the world. My delegation is therefore pleased to note
that the Report before us incorporates a cultural and religious component in its
global strategy.
Representatives will recall how the UN dedicated the year 2001
to dialogue among civilizations and how, last November, the Secretary-General
launched the Alliance of Civilizations. Not long ago, a Tripartite Forum on
inter-religious dialogue and cooperation for peace was also launched to bring
together Governments, the UN system and civil society. My delegation hopes that
good use should be made of this new interest in the UN in cooperation among
religions and in building bridges between cultures and civilizations.
Undoubtedly, religion has an enormously positive potential when given the
chance.
The Holy See is willing to support initiatives that encourage
believers to be agents of peace and join all those who would be builders of our
peaceful coexistence. Moreover, when religion’s true nature is rightly
understood and lived out, it can become part of the solution rather than the
problem, because it will promote humane engagement and regard for the dignity of
others, to the common good of us all.
This Organisation should therefore encourage religions to make
this important contribution on their own terms: that is, religions are called to
create, support and promote the precondition of every encounter, every dialogue,
and of every understanding of pluralism and cultural difference. That
precondition, Mr President, is the dignity of the human person.
Our common human dignity is a true precondition because it comes
before every other consideration or methodological principle, even those of
international law. We see it in the "Golden Rule", found throughout the
religions of the world. Another description of this concept is reciprocity.
Encouraging awareness and experience of this common heritage
within and among religions will surely help in the translation of this positive
vision into political and social categories which will, in their turn, inform
the juridical categories linked to national and international relations.
My delegation is also gratified to see the way the question of
incitement to terrorism has been dealt with in the report before us. We all know
that the skilful use of the internet and mass media make terrorism a
transnational, globally coordinated phenomenon, requiring therefore an equally
powerful, globally coordinated solution.
In this context, we renew our support of Security Council
resolution 1624 which both condemned "in the strongest terms the incitement of
terrorist acts" and repudiated "attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie)
of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts". Measures to confront
any actor or entity whatsoever that financially support intolerance or ethnic
and religious hatred are essential to a global strategy.
The political, social and economic exclusion of immigrant
communities stokes the frustration of young people and has led to breakdowns in
order in some places; but the demand for a just solution to these questions
remains a legitimate one. By resolving such questions, swiftly and justly,
nations can rob terrorists of the oxygen of hatred and of grievances, real or
imagined, by which they attempt to legitimize their evil deeds and recruit the
impressionable.
Although how to stop the use of day to day materials against
soft targets is often the more difficult problem to solve, denying terrorists
weapons, including WMD, is obviously part of the struggle. In this context, my
delegation welcomes Security Council resolution 1673 on non-proliferation. We
also agree that it must be the common goal of states to secure, and wherever
possible eliminate, nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological weapons and
implement effective domestic and export controls on dual-use materials related
to weapons of mass destruction.
Furthermore, it appears that bioterrorism is a grave but
seriously under-addressed threat. As we have seen in other theatres of action,
the cost of doing nothing could far outstrip the cost of a major initiative now
to strengthen public health systems’ capacity to cope with such a terrible
eventuality. As the report points out, important investments now in this field
could in the meantime also have positive spin-offs in the general quality of
healthcare available.
Finally, Mr President, counter-terrorism must be characterised
by denying the moral high ground to terrorists. This is just one reason why the
treatment of terrorists and suspects should be according to international
humanitarian norms in a struggle which is ultimately one for hearts and minds.
Thank you, Mr President.
|