INTERVENTION BY THE HOLY SEE AT THE SECOND COMMISSION OF THE 61st SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS
STATEMENT BY H.E. MONS. CELESTINO MIGLIORE
New York
Tuesday, 10 October 2006
Madam Chair,
My delegation welcomes this discussion on the subject of
Financing for Development, in particular the specific recommendations contained
in this report that are intended to result in concrete follow up action.
At the outset, it concurs with the emphasis given to fighting
all forms of corruption and to the importance attributed to having a sound
governance framework and strong institutions to enable effective resource
mobilization. At the same time, it recognizes that the task of improving
existing governance frameworks in developing countries must necessarily be a
gradual process.
My delegation also concurs with the view that low-income
developing countries face the greatest difficulties in mobilizing domestic
resources for development. These countries should therefore be the subjects of
particular attention, especially since foreign direct investment (FDI) is
unlikely to be significant, primarily because it is not meant to resolve
problems of poverty and development as such, but it may help do so if properly
regulated.
The Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), prepared by
developing country governments through participatory processes, have an
important role in this process since they could provide an appropriate framework
for defining national development strategies. In this regard, the encouraging
progress made by 70 low-income developing countries in completing 50 PRSPs by
June 2006 is, in itself, a testimony to the importance these strategy papers
have for increasing domestic resources.
The PRSPs could also provide an important link to the
achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by low-income developing
countries, many of which are well behind the targets to be reached by 2015.
Given the importance that the PRSPs have for poverty reduction, the Holy See
would encourage all global institutions committed to reducing poverty in the
poorest countries of the world to stay actively engaged in this process and
closely monitor, if possible annually, the progress being made by each of these
countries towards the MDGs they have set for themselves.
The importance of the mobilization of finances in the developing
world and their effective use within those economies is of little doubt,
although the reality matching the commitment can always be improved. The task
for states in this regard would seem to be the promotion of those circumstances
within their purview that can facilitate the mobilization of financial resources
for development, not just by facilitating FDI, but also through their own
ongoing initiatives.
In this context, it is also gratifying that the report notes how,
as a result of the commitments made at Monterrey, the decline in official
development assistance (ODA) has been reversed, a welcome and much-needed
positive trend, if developed states live up to their commitments. Nevertheless,
another $150bn will still have to be found if the MDGs are to have a chance of
success.
It is also welcome to see the emerging consensus among donors
and recipient Governments on the actions required to foster better development
results. The process towards greater mutual accountability for development
results has gained significant momentum since the Monterrey Conference, in
particular with the Rome High-level Forum on Harmonization and the Paris
High-level Forum on Joint Progress towards Enhanced Aid Effectiveness. The
principles of ownership, harmonization, alignment, results and mutual
accountability appear sound and, it is to be hoped, will be a further step on
the way to aid effectiveness.
External debt, which has crippled many economies for decades,
also remains a concern although several useful initiatives are making inroads
into the problem. The G8 proposal of July 2006 that IMF, the International
Development Association (IDA) and the African Development Fund cancel 100% of
their claims over the poorest countries, most of them in Africa, is a welcome
addition to the other initiatives in this regard.
The report, therefore, paints a generally positive picture of
the engagement in this field since Monterrey but, if the MDGs are to be reached
by 2015, it will be important for all partners to stay engaged and to address
systemic issues, above all those which concern steps to create and maintain an
equitable international monetary, financial and trading system which will be
fair, open and capable of supporting development.
Thank you, Madam Chair.
|