2 December 1999
1. The Holy See is pleased to participate in the Third Ministerial Conference
of the WTO, as it acknowledges the importance of a ruled-based Multilateral
Trade System (MTS) for the world economy and for the development of each
country. As an observer, the Holy See has been following with great interest the
ongoing debate on the scope and objectives of the upcoming Millennium Round
negotiations, and takes this opportunity to submit some concerns and suggestions
on the issues at stake.
2. The initial implementation of the Uruguay Round agreements has shown
significant progress made by developing countries in adopting policies of market
liberalization, but poverty and marginalization have not been defeated.
Nevertheless, the poorest countries (i.d. those in the U.N. LDC list and many
other poor, small or transition economies) , still hoping that trade could be a
decisive help in their development, are struggling to adapt to the WTO rules and
to the global trading system. The Holy See considers that the MTS will only be
accomplished when such countries are able to integrate themselves within the
international community, while keeping their ability to promote the human and
sustainable development of their citizens.
The positive answer of developing countries to the propositions of the
Marrakesh Act and of the Singapore and Geneva Conferences should find a
corresponding response from the big economic powers in the promotion of a trade
environment that is friendly to development and to the fight against extreme
poverty. It is especially striking that the LDCs’ share of international trade
is still only about half of one per cent, having declined since 1990. Further
efforts are needed therefore to ensure that all partners have the opportunity to
benefit from open markets and the free flow of goods, services and capital. As
Pope John Paul II wrote in the Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus, “The poor
ask for the right to share in enjoying material goods and to make good use of
their capacity to work, thus creating a world that is more just and prosperous
for all. The advancement of the poor constitutes a great opportunity for the
moral, cultural and even economic growth of all humanity” (N.28). In his
message to the Global Forum for Poverty Eradication, the Director- General of
the WTO, Mr. Mike Moore, stated very clearly that “the objective of trade must
be the lifting of living standards”. The Holy See thus invites negotiators to
take into account the needs of developing countries and the difficulties they
face in gaining access to international markets.
3. The inability of LDCs and weak economies to take full advantage of the
opportunities provided by the existing WTO Agreements includes, among other
problems, a shortage of skilled personnel able to tackle the complexity of WTO
working structures and rules, the inability to upgrade domestic regulations,
weak institutional infrastructure (especially in sophisticated areas, such as
intellectual property law), and the high cost of maintaining missions in Geneva.
These constraints should be addressed through a substantial increase in the
provision of all kinds of assistance (such as that supplied by the technical
cooperation activities of WTO, UNCTAD and ITC) so that the negotiating capacity
of these countries may be developed and sustained (Cfr. Pope John Paul II,
Encyclical Centesimus Annus (1991), N. 59).
So far, LDCs and other poor countries have been unable to take advantage of
the Dispute Settlement mechanism because of their lack of financial resources
and paucity of legal expertise. Panels could be made more representative, by
including experts from developed, developing and least developed countries. The
proposed Legal Advisory Center should be established without further delay, in
order to meet the needs of poor countries in terms of securing their rights
through the use of the DSU.
Fast-track membership of WTO by those poor, small or transition economies
which are not yet members could also be an important part of the efforts of the
international community. A clear and simplified procedure could be established
for potential members, so that they might be accepted within a year and not be
subject to commitments that go beyond those of LDC Members of WTO.
4. The improvement of poor countries legal and managerial expertise will be
void if not accompanied by measures designed to promote the substantive
participation of their trade in the MTS. These measures should begin with the
fulfilment of existing rules in ways that ensure an effective response to the
concerns of developing countries. The implementation of the special and
differential treatment provisions, while providing such countries with
technical, legal and financial assistance, are a step in this direction. Viewed
comprehensively, special and differential treatment goes beyond preferential
tariffs and transition periods, and addresses key elements of economic growth
and development - knowledge, technological skills and information.
Among the arrangements which will further strengthen the trade position of
LDCs and other weak countries, an agreement on obligatory duty-free and
quota-free market access for all products originating in LDCs seems still very
desirable, despite the difficulties implied in its implementation.The Holy See
also hopes that the next negotiating round will meet the main expectations of
developing countries, in order to promote development and poverty alleviation
and to enable all countries, especially the weakest economies, to reap the full
benefits of the MTS.
5. Liberalization of trade in agriculture, which is of great importance to
developing countries that are food and raw material exporters, should not be
accompanied by undesirable effects on net food-importing developing countries.
The poorest countries should be able to take advantage of any further opening of
agricultural markets, while keeping their ability to establish appropriate trade
policies to promote their own production. Such a specific legal umbrella in
favor of LDCs and NFIDCs should be complemented with all the necessary technical
and financial assistance, bilateral and multilateral, to increase local food
production and to assure food security.
6. Art. 66.2 of the TRIPs agreement was conceived to compensate the
constraints imposed by the new Intellectual property regime. Its provisions,
therefore, need to be implemented in ways that promote the mobilization of
science in favor of development. The poorest countries are subject to particular
difficulties in terms of weather, soils, agriculture, basic health and tropical
diseases which can only be overcome through a constant flow of specific
knowledge. The provisions of the TRIPs should not impede rapid and cheap access
to the means for production of essential drugs and to other medicines needed to
face the main scourges suffered by the poorest countries’ populations. Beyond
the existing TRIPs, new legal tools which take into account both the due share
of essential technology and the reasonable interests of patents and copyright
owners will be helpful in overcoming the technological gap. Further scientific
and political work should also be undertaken in order to devise ways of
protecting and integrating in the MTS biodiversity, traditional knowledge,
folklore and farmers’ rights(1).
7. There are some sensitive questions concerning developed countries, as well
as middle income and poor countries, such as human rights, labor questions,
environmental degradation, biotechnology and health which, notwithstanding their
links with trade, will have their full solution beyond the confines of WTO. All
of these need to be handled in a spirit of prudence and cooperation, while
seeking a broad and long term consensus on the basics of human sustainable
development.
8. Questions of human and labor rights deserve particular attention. The Holy
See greatly appreciates the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights
at Work, and considers it to be an appropriate response to the challenges
presented by the globalized economy. Child labor, organized prostitution,
slavery and forced labor, and the proscription of labor unions can never be part
of national policy or be defended by a country’s right to development ( Cfr.
Pope John Paul II, Encyclical Laborem Exercens (1981), N. 17) . But, in order to
facilitate full compliance with the principles enunciated in the ILO
Declaration, rich countries need to avoid any kind of protectionism in the guise
of the aforesaid principles.
9. The international debate should acknowledge the Multilateral Environment
Agreements in ways that are fair, non protectionist and able to cope with the
most urgent problems of the poorest countries, so as to promote the conditions
necessary for authentic human ecology (Cfr. Pope John Paul II, Encyclical
Centesimus Annus (1991), N. 38). The economic cost of international environment
management should be borne mainly by the richer countries, in order to avoid
imposing on LDCs and weak economies additional burdens and strain(2).
10. In addition, the beneficial insertion of LDCs, small, poor and transition
economies into the global economy requires an innovative and consistent
commitment to relieving the burden of international debt, and to renewing and
increasing bilateral and multilateral ODA. This approach goes beyond the
competence of WTO, but is necessary for the well-being of the MTS itself.
12. Finally, civil society is increasingly becoming an important player in
global governance. The WTO has undertaken a series of initiatives in order to
make the work of the organization more transparent and open towards civil
society. However, the WTO has faced a series of constraints in this first phase
of dialogue; among others, the lack of adequate personnel, funds and information
for systematic contact with civil society groups.
Looking towards the future, it will be important for the WTO to build a more
systematic and constructive dialogue with representative civil society groups
and to devise mechanisms for permanent accreditation and regular consultation.
Sharing the experiences of other international organizations, especially the
United Nations system, could also be helpful at this stage. Special efforts
should be made to include civic groups from developing countries and ensure a
representative spectrum of organizations. NGOs could, for their part, stimulate
debate on the issues at stake in the WTO and thus produce a more fruitful
exchange at all levels.
----------
(1) Cfr. Convention on Biological Diversity, 5 June 1992.
(2) Cfr. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, UNCED, 92. Principle
N. 7.