|
CIRCULAR LETTER ON THE STATE AND ACTIVITY OF TRIBUNALS
Eminent among the functions attributed to this Supreme Tribunal is the duty to
ensure that justice is correctly administered in the whole Church[1].
This duty is commended in the apostolic constitution promulgated by Blessed Paul
VI, Regimini Ecclesiae universae, which united the solicitude for all
judicial cases and tribunals solely in the Apostolic Signatura[2]. To render effective its newly acquired competence, this Supreme Tribunal
immediately issued its 1970 circular letter on the state and activity of
ecclesiastical tribunals (AAS 63 [1971] 480-486), to which was attached a form
for drawing up the annual report on the state and activity of each tribunal.
Now nearly fifty years later, given the many significant changes and
transformations in the Church and in her law and structures during this period,
it seemed most opportune that those norms and report form be revised and
reissued.
These new norms must especially take into account the recent changes in both
Codes of Canon Law on the processes for the declaration of marriage nullity,
brought about by the two motu proprio Apostolic Letters, Mitis Iudex
Dominus Iesus and Mitis et misericors Iesus.
I
Among the fundamental criteria for the recent reform of procedural law, there
stands out the time-honored principle, lately reemphasized, of the Bishop
exercising his original judicial function in the particular Church. “In order
that a teaching of the Second Vatican Council regarding a certain area of great
importance finally be put into practice, it has been decided to declare openly
that the bishop himself, in the church over which he has been appointed shepherd
and head, is by that very fact the judge of those faithful entrusted to his
care”[3].
What is said of the judicial function is likewise to be understood of the
responsibility of a Bishop to be vigilant over the correct administration of
justice in his particular Church[4]. Roman Pontiffs have not hesitated to call this duty to mind, repeatedly and
explicitly, especially on the occasion of the annual allocutions to the Roman
Rota[5].
Because of the close and innate bond of communion between Bishops and the Roman
Pontiff, who is the Successor of Peter, the judicial office of Bishops in their
particular Churches is indissolubly bound up with the Petrine office, which in
its origin is meant to strengthen and support the office of Bishops. For, as the
two recent motu proprio Apostolic Letters state, Bishops, together with
the Roman Pontiff, have a share in the “ecclesial duty of safeguarding the unity
of the faith and teaching regarding marriage, the source and center of the
Christian family”[6].
It is out of this Petrine office that the Apostolic Signatura’s function to
ensure the correct administration of justice in whole Church arises. From the
time that this task was entrusted to it, this Supreme Tribunal has accordingly
desired and continues to desire to carry it out “not with the mindset that
everything should be deferred to it alone, but that it may offer fraternal help
to the tribunals of Bishops scattered throughout the world and provide them with
a service for the good of souls through the correct administration of justice”[7].
II
The attentive promotion of the administration of justice requires, as is only
fitting, knowledge, that is, information concerning the state and activities of
tribunals, on the part of both the Bishop Moderators and the Apostolic Signatura[8].
For which reason, each and every tribunal, be it diocesan or eparchial,
interdiocesan or intereparchial, of the Latin Church or of the Eastern Churches,
is obliged to prepare a yearly report on its state and activity, to be signed by
the Judicial Vicar, using the accompanying form.
The form is to be carefully and accurately filled out and then reproduced in
triplicate, the first copy being given to the Bishop Moderator, the second sent
to the Apostolic Signatura, and the third kept in the tribunal archives.
The copy for this Supreme Tribunal is to be sent in each year in the month of
January. This may be done by email, by postal service, by diplomatic pouch, or
even by hand delivering a copy to the Chancery of the Apostolic Signatura.
Useful as well will be the Judicial Vicar’s comments that accompany the report,
especially in the matters of:
1) the prior pastoral investigation described in articles 2-5 of the Rationes
procedendi adjoined to the two motu proprio Apostolic Letters;
2) any instructional sections and their arrangements;
3) any possible changes in the arrangement of tribunals;
4) the norms that regulate procedural expenses, advocate fees and gratuitous legal
assistance, and their observance[9];
5) the formation of tribunal ministers and any local initiatives related to their
continued formation or to their obtaining academic degrees in canon law;
6) other important things that occur at the tribunal regarding judicial matters.
Sentences issued according to the briefer matrimonial process before the Bishop
must also be reported on the attached form, since by them the Bishop himself
exercises the judicial office. Indeed, the briefer matrimonial process,
according to the recent reform, is inextricably linked to the tribunal, whether
it be diocesan, eparchial, interdiocesan or intereparchial[10].
III
Having received and studied the report on the state and activity of a tribunal,
the Apostolic Signatura will offer its observations. These observations are sent
to the Bishop Moderator so that, if need be, he may investigate, make
provisions, and then, should it be necessary, report back to the Apostolic
Signatura. Thus, a dialogue is initiated between the first guarantor of the
correct administration of justice, namely, the Bishop Moderator, and the
Apostolic Signatura, which stands as the representative of the Holy Father’s
solicitude in the same matter.
The observations of the Apostolic Signatura comprise many things, according to
the specifics of each case: compliments, approvals, commendations, advice,
suggestions, recommendations, cautions, examples, notices, expert opinions and
encouragements; simply put, all those things that can be a help or assistance
for tribunals, always without prejudice to the freedom of judges in pronouncing
sentences.
On the basis of the reports on the state and activity of tribunals, the
Apostolic Signatura is able to carry out its office with greater effectiveness,
especially: granting dispensations from an academic degree in canon law in a
more considered manner; making suggestions for the drawing up of more suitable
norms; requesting and examining sentences and the acts of cases in order to
safeguard correct jurisprudence[11]; arranging meetings with Bishop Moderators, whether all together at the time of
ad limina visits or individually, when this seems necessary or useful;
promoting, for the sake of the faithful, cooperation among the tribunals
dispersed throughout the world; offering the Dicasteries of the Roman Curia
necessary or requested information on the existence, organization and actual
state of tribunals.
The vigilance of the Apostolic Signatura is exercised according to the norms
that govern it, according to the sound principle of subsidiarity, and most
importantly according to the divine constitution of the Church, and is usually
carried out through the Bishop Moderators. If it becomes necessary for the
Apostolic Signatura to intervene – which is always done with the knowledge of
the Bishop Moderators – this, for the most part, occurs when the intervention
would extend to several tribunals, or if the Bishop Moderators themselves
request it, or finally when, all things considered, such an intervention becomes
necessary.
This action of vigilance, no matter its form, presupposes the willing
collaboration of the Bishop Moderators and the ministers of the tribunal, for
whose sake it is carried out.
***
Communion draws life from communication, and communication is at the service of
communion: upon this remote foundation stands the rationale for the reports on
the state and activity of tribunals. It is hoped that these reports may be of
help both to Bishop Moderators and to the Apostolic Signatura in the faithful
discharge of their respective duties.
Given in Rome, at the seat of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura,
30 July 2016.
Dominique Card. Mamberti
Prefect
+ Frans Daneels, o.praem.
Titular Archbishop of Bita
Secretary
+ Giuseppe Sciacca
Titular Bishop of Fondi
Adjunct Secretary
Prot. n. 51712/16 VT
[1] Cf. can. 1445, § 3 CIC; John Paul II, Apostolic Constitution Pastor
bonus, 28 June 1988, artt. 121 and 124, in AAS 80 (1988) 891, 892; Benedict XVI,
Apostolic Letter motu proprio Antiqua ordinatione, 21 June 2008, Lex
propria Supremi Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunalis, artt. 32, 35 and Title V:
De administrativa ratione procedendi, in AAS 100 (2008) 521, 522,
535-538. [2] Paul VI, Apostolic Constitution
Regimini Ecclesiae universae, 15
August 1967, n. 105, in AAS 59 (1967) 921. With respect to the duty of vigilance
previously entrusted to the Sacred Congregation for the Discipline of the
Sacraments, see, Circular Letter In Plenariis, 1 July 1932, in AAS 24
(1932) 272-274; erection of the Office of Vigilance in the same Dicastery, 24
May 1939.
[3] Francis, Apostolic Letter motu proprio
Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus,
15 August 2015, Preface, III, in AAS 107 (2015) 959-960; Francis, Apostolic
Letter motu proprio Mitis et misericors Iesus, 15 August 2015, Preface,
in AAS 107 (2015) 947.
[4] Cf. Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Circular Letter
Visis
actis, 24 July 1972; Instruction Dignitas connubii, 25 January 2005,
art. 38, § 4; Congregation for Bishops, Directory for the Pastoral Ministry
of Bishops “Apostolorum Successores”, 22 February 2004, nn. 68 and 180.
[5] See, for example, John Paul II,
Allocution to the Roman Rota, 29
January 2005, n. 4, in AAS 97 (2005) 165.
[6] Francis, Apostolic Letter motu proprio
Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus,
15 August 2015, Preface, in AAS 107 (2015) 959; see also Francis, Apostolic
Letter motu proprio Mitis et misericors Iesus, 15 August 2015, Preface:
“the bishop himself ... who, due to his duty as pastor, has the greatest care
for catholic unity with Peter in faith and discipline” (AAS 107 [2015] 948).
[7] Supremum Signaturae Apostolicae Tribunal, Circular Letter
Inter cetera,
28 December 1970, n. 5, in AAS 63 (1971) 482.
[8] Cf. Benedict XVI,
Address to the Plenary Session of the Supreme
Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, 4 February 2011, in AAS 103 (2011) 116:
“Among other things, as the Lex propria points out, this entails
maintaining an up-to-date body of information on the state and activity of the
local tribunals by means of the annual report which each tribunal is bound to
send to the Apostolic Signatura. It also involves the organization and
elaboration of the data that comes from these reports; the identification of
strategies for an appropriate use of human and institutional resources in the
local tribunals, as well as the constant practice of communicating with the
Bishop-Moderators of the diocesan and interdiocesan tribunals, who have direct
responsibility, institutionally, for the administration of justice. This is a
coordinated and patient task which aims above all to provide for the faithful
the correct, rapid and efficient administration of justice”.
[9] See cann. 1649 CIC and 1334-1336 CCEO.
[10] See Francis, Apostolic Letter motu proprio
Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus,
15 August 2015, can. 1676 and art. 19 of the Ratio procedendi, in AAS 107
(2015) 963-963, 970; Francis, Apostolic Letter motu proprio Mitis et
misericors Iesus, 15 August 2015, can. 1362 and art. 19 of the Ratio
procedendi, in AAS 107 (2015) 950, 957.
[11] Cf. Benedict XVI,
Address to the Plenary Session of the Supreme
Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, 4 February 2011, in AAS 103 (2011) 117:
“However, vigilance over the correct administration of justice would be
inadequate if it did not also entail the function of safeguarding correct
jurisprudence (cf. Lex propria, art. 111, § 1). The means for
knowing and for intervening, which the Lex propria and its own
institutional position provide to this Apostolic Signatura, permit it to act in
a manner that, in synergy with the Tribunal of the Roman Rota (cf.
Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus, art. 126), proves providential for
the Church. The exhortations and prescriptions which this Apostolic Signatura
includes in its responses to the annual reports of the local tribunals not
infrequently recommend to the respective Bishop-Moderators knowledge of and
adherence to not only the directives proposed in the Pope’s annual Addresses to
the Roman Rota, but also common Rotal jurisprudence regarding specific aspects
that are crucial to the individual tribunals”.
|